Author Topic: MBS Podcast Episode 10  (Read 2511 times)

Ruckdog

  • Administrator
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 3066
  • Number of Times Thanked: 189
  • Dive! Dive!
    • View Profile
    • Man Battlestations!
MBS Podcast Episode 10
« on: September 05, 2016, 07:07:21 pm »
Star Trek turns 50 years old this month! In celebration, Greg and Andy discuss combat in the Star Trek universe, as seen in the various TV series and movies. Later on, they do a full review of Star Trek Attack Wing. And finally, Greg and Andy discuss their experiences at recent conventions they attended!

Star Trek Combat: 58 Min

Landlubber's Musings: 1 Hr 57 Min

Star Trek Attack Wing Review: 2 Hr 2 Min

Ruckdog'€™s Report: 2 Hr 59 Min

Gencon and Tacticon Experiences:3 Hr 9 Min

http://www.manbattlestations.com/blog/2016/09/05/episode-10/

Stephan

  • Commander
  • ***
  • Posts: 583
  • Number of Times Thanked: 6
    • View Profile
Re: MBS Podcast Episode 10
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2016, 02:26:36 pm »
I'm partway through listening to Ep 10.  Great job as always.  I'd be happy to chat a bit about Star Trek Online (STO).  For the 50th Anniversary, they've made this summer's big expansion Agents of Yesterday, which is a setting for new characters to begin play during the timeframe of ToS, the 23rd Century.  I've been taking a break this summer, but will jump back in to check out the new expansion.

You can check out some details here:

http://sto.gamepedia.com/Agents_Of_Yesterday

Ryjak

  • Lieutenant
  • **
  • Posts: 143
  • Number of Times Thanked: 2
    • View Profile
    • Ops Center
Re: MBS Podcast Episode 10
« Reply #2 on: September 10, 2016, 07:15:06 am »
While I am enjoying the two of you banter back and forth on Star Trek this and that, a 4-hour episode is crazy.  There is a reason for-profit podcasts are 30-60 minutes, and it has to do with 'attention span'.  I can't listen to but 30 minutes at a time during my commute, and every break from the show necessitates either a few minute review or just pick up where I stopped and hopefully know what you're talking about.

Also, Landlubber is terrible at fan communication.  I wanted to talk to him about the RSN and Civilization Revolutions, and he won't reply... :(

Ruckdog

  • Administrator
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 3066
  • Number of Times Thanked: 189
  • Dive! Dive!
    • View Profile
    • Man Battlestations!
Re: MBS Podcast Episode 10
« Reply #3 on: September 10, 2016, 06:19:14 pm »
I'm partway through listening to Ep 10.  Great job as always.  I'd be happy to chat a bit about Star Trek Online (STO).  For the 50th Anniversary, they've made this summer's big expansion Agents of Yesterday, which is a setting for new characters to begin play during the timeframe of ToS, the 23rd Century.  I've been taking a break this summer, but will jump back in to check out the new expansion.

You can check out some details here:

http://sto.gamepedia.com/Agents_Of_Yesterday

Thanks! Appreciate the link!

While I am enjoying the two of you banter back and forth on Star Trek this and that, a 4-hour episode is crazy.  There is a reason for-profit podcasts are 30-60 minutes, and it has to do with 'attention span'.  I can't listen to but 30 minutes at a time during my commute, and every break from the show necessitates either a few minute review or just pick up where I stopped and hopefully know what you're talking about.

Also, Landlubber is terrible at fan communication.  I wanted to talk to him about the RSN and Civilization Revolutions, and he won't reply... :(

Yeah, our episodes have been steadily getting longer. Since I listen to the D6G a lot, I hadn't really considered it much of an issue, but you make a fair point. How have you been trying to contact Landlubber?

Ryjak

  • Lieutenant
  • **
  • Posts: 143
  • Number of Times Thanked: 2
    • View Profile
    • Ops Center
Re: MBS Podcast Episode 10
« Reply #4 on: September 10, 2016, 11:30:41 pm »
Just a text message or two...

Landlubber

  • Administrator
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Number of Times Thanked: 64
    • View Profile
Re: MBS Podcast Episode 10
« Reply #5 on: September 11, 2016, 12:41:01 am »
In my defense, I was in the process of shelving Firestorm Armada for the summer when you contacted me about the RSN...and my text chain shows I texted you back about playing Civ Rev... :D  I actually haven't fired up the Xbox in at least a month. Between work, model painting, and the start of college football, I just haven't had time to play anything electronic.

Regarding the podcast length...I didn't notice, actually. But that is a bit long, you're right. I blame Ruckdog.  ;)
« Last Edit: September 11, 2016, 12:42:32 am by Landlubber »
"Sometimes, you gotta roll the hard six."--Commander Adama

Dakkar

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1175
  • Number of Times Thanked: 25
  • Mobilis in Mobili
    • View Profile
Re: MBS Podcast Episode 10
« Reply #6 on: September 13, 2016, 05:05:02 pm »
I don't mind the long episodes, since the content is plenty good. There's lots of other podcaster segments I fast-forward through (App of the Ep, Hollywood Minute, etc)

I'm not quite done with the episode, but I need to get my thoughts down now before I forget.

I loved the overall Trek discussions, so many things to comment on I wished we were simply discussing over beers so I could add. Here's some stuff I shouted at the iPod:

-- Planetary Bombardment

Though you spent a lot on this, I'm surprised no one cited the threat to the Halkans in MIRROR MIRROR. The Mirror universe Spock makes it quite clear they could wipe the Halkan cities off the map, one by one.

Kirk used the same threat against Eminiar VII in TASTE OF ARMAGEDDON. And Garth of Izar tried to do it to the planet Antos.

There's also an example of using ship's phasers on a lower setting to stun an entire city block, I believe that was in PIECE OF THE ACTION.

So yes, the weapons potential of a single starship is terrifying.

BTW, the single worst atrocity in the series (setting aside the Borg empire overall) is probably the Douwd known as "Kevin Uxbridge" destroying the entire Husnock race, 50 billion of them, instantaneously in a fit of rage.

-- Other Non-Military Ships

You mused if we'd seen many non-military vessels outside of Starfleet? First obvious answer is the many times we've seen Vulcan ships.
We've also seen Romulan Science vessels (they're in STAW!)
And Ferengi ships are merchantmen by definition. Just also very well armed.

-- Space Battles

Objectively, DS9 has the best space battles, and likely its the one in SACRIFICE OF ANGELS that you mentioned that is the best.
Wrath of Khan has perhaps the best overall dramatic presentation, but essentially its an old broadsides battle, a slow motion pass, that then turns into a submarine fight. Very little that's quintessentially and uniquely a "space battle" beyond the 3-D zinger.
For actual FLEET battles, you need DS9 or Babylon 5

-- Characters commanding other races ships

Some examples off memory - Troi commands a Romulan D"Deridex, albeit in disguise. Riker commands a Klingon Bird of Prey in the officer exchange episode. And a weird twist one - Worf (and Kehylar) once commanded the Enterprise as Klingons under a Klingon flag.

-- Abramsverse Trek

The comics prequels to the 2009 Trek reboot are the only place that explains WTF is going on. Nero's ship was indeed originally a mining vessel, but after the destruction of Romulus, they find shelter at a secret Tal'Shiar base where they were retrofitting and reverse engineering Borg tech. Nero has the experimental tech sort of assimilate his mining ship, which is why its such a monster.
After they destroy the Kelvin, per the comic, they invade Klingon space, and actually fight, get captured by, and escape from the Klingons over the next 2 decades. hence the huge time jump while Kirk grows up, and all the scars Nero and the others acquire.
Its extra sh*tty evidence against JJ that he so casually skipped all that. It almost makes the idiocy of Starkiller Base pale in comparison. Almost.

I loved the observation that the JJ-Verse is super different because of that time incursion too. INTO DARKNESS , despite failings, makes it clear what happens when your fleet is solely driven by military concerns over exploration.

-- STAW Scale

With all due respect and affection, Greg - Get over it :-) ;-)
NONE of the distances in any of our tabletop space games is to scale, even representatively. So why do ships bother you thus?
Accurate Star Trek scale using say the current Enterprise D as a baseline would require (I'll quote from another discussion) - "the Borg cube would take a whole table, the D'Deridex would almost be the size of of the current Cube model, and Dominion ships would be even bigger than that."
And the variety is too vast to even do "class sizes" ala Star Wars Armada.
Think of them instead as Tactical Plot Icons - all same sized representations of ships for simple relative positioning.

My only real and valid scale gripe is the Tinyprise. WhizKids could totally afford and make a "regular sized" version of the classic Enterprise, but they choose to fall back on the old sculpt.

-- STAW Review

While I know at least Andy is enthusiastic about the game, your overall review came across as "damning with faint praise", but I'm not sure that was your actual goal. If you wanted to talk people out of the game and to just play X-Wing instead, you succeeded.
And a note on play balance, only the early wave days featured promo ships with OP and desirable cards. Later ones have simply been cool to have, maybe with very good combos, but far from essential ones. And since the Borg reset back in 2015, balance in Faction pure (or faction Pure by ship) I find BETTER than X-Wing (which still mostly succumbs to turret ship gimmicks).

-- Online Discount Comments

Another gentle critique - over several reviews now, you'll comment on MSRP, and then add in slightly conspiratorial tones that listeners could easily get it all super-cheap online. I bristle at even passive encouragement of such.
The listeners already KNOW there are online discounts. What should be actively encouraged is buying from the LGS so our gaming hobby actually has a future. I know this is a whole other topic.  But if everything went to online sales and kickstarter, we'd all be stuck gaming only in each other's basements, or at "single game" game clubs only one night a week. Since our LGS fills up 6 of 7 nights a week with a different game each night, I shudder to think how many games would die if we went back to the game-club era. Variety would die out, and since Naval gaming has always been niche, the whole object of your podcast would be sent back to the chit and hex-map days.
Just sayin' ... ;-)

Then again, perhaps that's all according to Greg's plan, so he isn't tempted by too many games! ;-)

Oh, and last word on Trek overall. Besides actually playing STAW, Greg - you need to WATCH DEEP SPACE NINE. If I set TOS aside into a special category, DS9 is my favorite series hands-down.
Plus, I'd be very curious of your opinion in light of you only recently watching Babylon5.
One small caveat - just as TNG didn't really get good until Riker grows a beard, DS9 doesn't find its stride until Sisko grows a goatee.
:-)
« Last Edit: September 13, 2016, 06:29:33 pm by Dalek Unz »
"History is-a made at night. Character is what you are in the dark!"
-- Lord John Whorfin, Red Lectroid Leader

Dakkar

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1175
  • Number of Times Thanked: 25
  • Mobilis in Mobili
    • View Profile
Re: MBS Podcast Episode 10
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2016, 07:18:25 pm »
Did You Know...

that you can judge a Star Trek Captain by their favorite tasty beverage?

Kirk (Both versions): Romulan Ale

Picard: "Tea. Earl Grey. Hot"

Sisko: Raktajino (aka Klingon Coffee)

Janeway: Coffee, black like her heart

Archer: Passion Fruit Iced Tea ( He probably would have been a Zima drinker in our century...)

This only confirms my assertion that Sisko is the best Captain, and Archer by far the worst. :-)
"History is-a made at night. Character is what you are in the dark!"
-- Lord John Whorfin, Red Lectroid Leader

Dakkar

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1175
  • Number of Times Thanked: 25
  • Mobilis in Mobili
    • View Profile
Re: MBS Podcast Episode 10
« Reply #8 on: September 14, 2016, 01:31:05 pm »
Kudos on the best episode choices, especially "Dathan and Picard at El-Adrel"!

BTW - The idea for the Tamarian language is likely inspired by an old Gene Wolfe book where there's a holy man who speaks only in quotes from his holy book.
I've often theorized about having an entire conversation using only nerd TV and movie references and quotes.
"Swallow, it's airspeed unknown..."

BEST OF BOTH WORLDS perhaps has the best cliff-hanger ever in Trek. I well recall the AGES it seemed between Pt1 and pt 2.

As for my favorite ep, for a LONG time my default answer was CITY ON THE EDGE OF FOREVER. For a show that practically defined the time-travel paradox genre, that is certainly a good episode to claim #1 spot.
CITY goes on my list with a  dozen others I just couldn't pick between as "best" (incl YESTERDAYS ENTERPRISE, IN THE PALE MOONLIGHT, TRIBBLES, MIRROR MIRROR, AMOK TIME, DARMOK, DOOMSDAY MACHINE, BoBW, CHAIN OF COMMAND ["There are FOUR LIGHTS"], IN A MIRROR DARKLY )

But if I had to pick a current favorite of ALL the episodes, it's THE INNER LIGHT. That ep devastates me every time.

BTW - My home internet has been persistently down since last Thursday, so I haven't had a chance to upload Tacticon pics. I'll get to it as soon as I'm able.

"History is-a made at night. Character is what you are in the dark!"
-- Lord John Whorfin, Red Lectroid Leader

Ruckdog

  • Administrator
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 3066
  • Number of Times Thanked: 189
  • Dive! Dive!
    • View Profile
    • Man Battlestations!
Re: MBS Podcast Episode 10
« Reply #9 on: September 14, 2016, 02:46:08 pm »
Dale,

Great post! If you don't mind, I'm going to break it up and address some of your points individually.

I don't mind the long episodes, since the content is plenty good. There's lots of other podcaster segments I fast-forward through (App of the Ep, Hollywood Minute, etc)

Aww, shucks ;). In all seriousness, Landlubber and I appreciate your feedback, as well as Ryjaks. We are looking at possible format changes for the future, but certainly not before the New Year.

Quote
I loved the overall Trek discussions, so many things to comment on I wished we were simply discussing over beers so I could add. Here's some stuff I shouted at the iPod:

-- Planetary Bombardment

Though you spent a lot on this, I'm surprised no one cited the threat to the Halkans in MIRROR MIRROR. The Mirror universe Spock makes it quite clear they could wipe the Halkan cities off the map, one by one.

Kirk used the same threat against Eminiar VII in TASTE OF ARMAGEDDON. And Garth of Izar tried to do it to the planet Antos.

There's also an example of using ship's phasers on a lower setting to stun an entire city block, I believe that was in PIECE OF THE ACTION.

So yes, the weapons potential of a single starship is terrifying.

BTW, the single worst atrocity in the series (setting aside the Borg empire overall) is probably the Douwd known as "Kevin Uxbridge" destroying the entire Husnock race, 50 billion of them, instantaneously in a fit of rage.

Agreed! Having this conversation over some beers would be awesome. All good points here; the fact of the matter is that if you look at it from a physics perspective in terms of energy released, a M/AM explosive like a photon torpedo would be a city-killer if detonated in a planet's atmosphere!

Quote
-- Other Non-Military Ships

You mused if we'd seen many non-military vessels outside of Starfleet? First obvious answer is the many times we've seen Vulcan ships.
We've also seen Romulan Science vessels (they're in STAW!)
And Ferengi ships are merchantmen by definition. Just also very well armed.

Fair enough; plus, we have that generic triangular shaped Guest Ship of the Week that appeared in a ton of TNG episodes!


Quote
-- Space Battles

Objectively, DS9 has the best space battles, and likely its the one in SACRIFICE OF ANGELS that you mentioned that is the best.
Wrath of Khan has perhaps the best overall dramatic presentation, but essentially its an old broadsides battle, a slow motion pass, that then turns into a submarine fight. Very little that's quintessentially and uniquely a "space battle" beyond the 3-D zinger.
For actual FLEET battles, you need DS9 or Babylon 5

Totally agree. I just find the tightly wound tension of the cat-and-mouse battles in TWoK or even BALANCE OF TERROR to be engrossing!

Quote
-- Characters commanding other races ships

Some examples off memory - Troi commands a Romulan D"Deridex, albeit in disguise. Riker commands a Klingon Bird of Prey in the officer exchange episode. And a weird twist one - Worf (and Kehylar) once commanded the Enterprise as Klingons under a Klingon flag.

I had forgotten about that last one! Good points, though these tended to be exceptions rather than the rule as far as we know.


Quote
-- Abramsverse Trek

The comics prequels to the 2009 Trek reboot are the only place that explains WTF is going on. Nero's ship was indeed originally a mining vessel, but after the destruction of Romulus, they find shelter at a secret Tal'Shiar base where they were retrofitting and reverse engineering Borg tech. Nero has the experimental tech sort of assimilate his mining ship, which is why its such a monster.
After they destroy the Kelvin, per the comic, they invade Klingon space, and actually fight, get captured by, and escape from the Klingons over the next 2 decades. hence the huge time jump while Kirk grows up, and all the scars Nero and the others acquire.
Its extra sh*tty evidence against JJ that he so casually skipped all that. It almost makes the idiocy of Starkiller Base pale in comparison. Almost.

I loved the observation that the JJ-Verse is super different because of that time incursion too. INTO DARKNESS , despite failings, makes it clear what happens when your fleet is solely driven by military concerns over exploration.

Given the amount of stuff the novelization for Episode 7 apparently explains (I have yet to read it myself, but a coworker has), this seems to be a trend with Abrams!

Quote
-- STAW Scale

With all due respect and affection, Greg - Get over it :-) ;-)
NONE of the distances in any of our tabletop space games is to scale, even representatively. So why do ships bother you thus?
Accurate Star Trek scale using say the current Enterprise D as a baseline would require (I'll quote from another discussion) - "the Borg cube would take a whole table, the D'Deridex would almost be the size of of the current Cube model, and Dominion ships would be even bigger than that."
And the variety is too vast to even do "class sizes" ala Star Wars Armada.
Think of them instead as Tactical Plot Icons - all same sized representations of ships for simple relative positioning.

My only real and valid scale gripe is the Tinyprise. WhizKids could totally afford and make a "regular sized" version of the classic Enterprise, but they choose to fall back on the old sculpt.

The scale discussion in STAW is a fascinating one for me. I've been meaning to do an in-depth blog post on this for over a year. I need to get on that!

Quote
-- STAW Review

While I know at least Andy is enthusiastic about the game, your overall review came across as "damning with faint praise", but I'm not sure that was your actual goal. If you wanted to talk people out of the game and to just play X-Wing instead, you succeeded.
And a note on play balance, only the early wave days featured promo ships with OP and desirable cards. Later ones have simply been cool to have, maybe with very good combos, but far from essential ones. And since the Borg reset back in 2015, balance in Faction pure (or faction Pure by ship) I find BETTER than X-Wing (which still mostly succumbs to turret ship gimmicks).

Very good feedback, Dale. I think part of this is that while I've played more STAW than Greg, it still isn't a whole lot, and I'd wager that Greg has played a lot more X-Wing that I have. That, plus IP preference, may have skewed things a bit when it comes to the balance discussion. However, I still think we gave STAW a fair shake when it comes to components quality, gameplay, etc.

Quote
-- Online Discount Comments

Another gentle critique - over several reviews now, you'll comment on MSRP, and then add in slightly conspiratorial tones that listeners could easily get it all super-cheap online. I bristle at even passive encouragement of such.
The listeners already KNOW there are online discounts. What should be actively encouraged is buying from the LGS so our gaming hobby actually has a future. I know this is a whole other topic.  But if everything went to online sales and kickstarter, we'd all be stuck gaming only in each other's basements, or at "single game" game clubs only one night a week. Since our LGS fills up 6 of 7 nights a week with a different game each night, I shudder to think how many games would die if we went back to the game-club era. Variety would die out, and since Naval gaming has always been niche, the whole object of your podcast would be sent back to the chit and hex-map days.
Just sayin' ... ;-)

I must admit to being a bit embarrassed about this; I never intended or thought about my comments being interpreted as suggestion to not support local stores. It certainly wasn't my intention, but I certainly can see how what I've said in reviews can be easily interpreted as such. So, from now on I will avoid any such mentions in future reviews. And actually, I think you just gave me the topic for my next Ruckdog's Report ;). I agree though, this deserves a discussion thread of its own, as the decision to buy things from a store or not is a very complex one (and sometimes there isn't a choice, if one is not lucky enough to live near a store).


Quote
Oh, and last word on Trek overall. Besides actually playing STAW, Greg - you need to WATCH DEEP SPACE NINE. If I set TOS aside into a special category, DS9 is my favorite series hands-down.
Plus, I'd be very curious of your opinion in light of you only recently watching Babylon5.
One small caveat - just as TNG didn't really get good until Riker grows a beard, DS9 doesn't find its stride until Sisko grows a goatee.
:-)

Ha ha, I hadn't thought about the whole facial-hair angle, but you're right! One of these days, I want to go back and re-watch all of Trek. My boys will be old enough in a couple of years for me to start getting them hooked as well :).

Dakkar

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1175
  • Number of Times Thanked: 25
  • Mobilis in Mobili
    • View Profile
Re: MBS Podcast Episode 10
« Reply #10 on: September 14, 2016, 07:34:25 pm »
One of these days, I want to go back and re-watch all of Trek. My boys will be old enough in a couple of years for me to start getting them hooked as well :).

This is one of my chief regrets in not having kids of my own - never being able to revisit "the classics" with them.

For Trek or any movies really, I recommend an article series at Hitfix.com called FILM NERD 2.0. Their critic, Drew, recounts his own trials and tribulations introducing his young boys to the media he loves. They are truly one of the most engrossing and touching series of articles by a film critic I have ever read. And Drew is TOTALLY 'someone' we know well from the game store, without actually being a gamer. He's even turning the series into a book soon.

The article archive is here:
http://www.hitfix.com/motion-captured/film-nerd-2-0

I'd start WAY down the pages at the beginning and work forward. There's a real portrait of how his boys have grown up with film and TV.
And the regular column on the same site (Motion Captured) is awesome movie news as well. (For straight TV criticism, I prefer The Onion's AV Club TV section).

"History is-a made at night. Character is what you are in the dark!"
-- Lord John Whorfin, Red Lectroid Leader

Landlubber

  • Administrator
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Number of Times Thanked: 64
    • View Profile
Re: MBS Podcast Episode 10
« Reply #11 on: September 14, 2016, 10:43:11 pm »
@Dale--thanks for the feedback and discussion points.

I think the reason I get so hung up on the scale in ST:AW is because I'm really a "cinematic" gamer at heart--meaning I like the way things look on the table, interacting with each other. Firestorm Armada and Halo: Fleet Battles get a pass from me on issues of scale because there aren't several movies and TV series dedicated to their IPs. Not the case with Attack Wing, or Star Wars: Armada and X-Wing.

I know I need to watch DS9, and it's on my list to watch, but I can't really converse with you on Babylon 5. I got about a disc and a half into season three, and I had to pull the plug. The overarching story is somewhat interesting, but I can't focus on it through the poor CGI, bad acting, and (mostly) bad dialogue. I'm not trying to be shallow here or slaughter anyone's sacred cow, but it just doesn't do it for me. I stuck it out as long as I could, hoping it would get better, but for me there was no Riker-growing-a-beard or Sisko-growing-a-goatee moment where the show turned a corner and started getting better. With at least a few different actors (mostly the folks who play the humans--the aliens are fine), better set designs (why is everything in that station shades of purple???), and CGI on the level of the BSG reboot, it would shine. I know, I know, I've heard ALL the arguments. But I feel that I did give it an honest effort. The only thing I really liked about that show was the Starfury. Great design for a starfighter, right up there with the Viper MkII and the X-Wing.

"The Inner Light" is a GREAT episode, I had forgotten about that one. The scene at the end where he's playing the flute alone in his ready room hits me in the gut every time. And "Chain of Command" is also very good. I've seen people at conventions wearing shirts that say "There are FOUR lights!". I'd have to put that one in my top five TNG episodes, along with Darmok, The Wounded, and Schisms, the episode where Riker, LaForge, and others are being kidnapped in their sleep by aliens through a dimensional portal and having experiments performed on them. That one freaked me out a bit when I first saw it.

And I think we certainly could have an entire conversation using the Tamarian model. Like, when things are going really bad for you at work, you could say "Greg, his RSN against the Terrans."
"Sometimes, you gotta roll the hard six."--Commander Adama

Dakkar

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1175
  • Number of Times Thanked: 25
  • Mobilis in Mobili
    • View Profile
Re: MBS Podcast Episode 10
« Reply #12 on: September 14, 2016, 11:12:32 pm »
I got about a disc and a half into season three, and I had to pull the plug. The overarching story is somewhat interesting, but I can't focus on it through the poor CGI, bad acting, and (mostly) bad dialogue.

I respectfully disagree, and will now have to call you "Sheldon" when the B5 topic arises ;-)
"History is-a made at night. Character is what you are in the dark!"
-- Lord John Whorfin, Red Lectroid Leader

Landlubber

  • Administrator
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Number of Times Thanked: 64
    • View Profile
Re: MBS Podcast Episode 10
« Reply #13 on: September 14, 2016, 11:26:40 pm »
HAAAAAAAAAAA. That's fine. I can take it.

Part of it is also that I never connected with the show when it was on. I was in college and didn't watch much TV. I can give ST:TNG a pass on mediocre special effects because I have a connection with that show--I watched alot of it when it was still in production. I can certainly see the flaws in it now (as I mostly could back then), but they don't bother me as much.

I don't have that connection with B5. And that's a personal thing too...one of my DW opponents at the Haven is about 13 years younger than I am and LOVES B5, even though he didn't watch it while it was on TV.

We'll just have to agree to disagree.  ;)
"Sometimes, you gotta roll the hard six."--Commander Adama

Dakkar

  • Rear Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 1175
  • Number of Times Thanked: 25
  • Mobilis in Mobili
    • View Profile
Re: MBS Podcast Episode 10
« Reply #14 on: September 15, 2016, 05:50:40 pm »
We'll just have to agree to disagree. that Greg is wrong

Fixed that for you. :-)

And you're right - we connect to shows based on the times we watch them, and our values and standards at that time. Not watching B5 until now, when you've been MASSIVELY spoiled by CGI that doesn't run on an Amiga PC ... of course its tougher.
For example, I adore LOST IN SPACE and all the old IRWIN ALLEN shows I watched while growing up (and while the original Sci Fi channel aired them). But if I was to only see them now for the first time, they'd be too hokey for my time.
"History is-a made at night. Character is what you are in the dark!"
-- Lord John Whorfin, Red Lectroid Leader