Author Topic: Heavy Bomber Comparison  (Read 1417 times)

Ruckdog

  • Administrator
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 3066
  • Number of Times Thanked: 189
  • Dive! Dive!
    • View Profile
    • Man Battlestations!
Heavy Bomber Comparison
« on: May 22, 2015, 02:14:25 pm »
The Heavy Bomber is a completely new unit type that showed up in DW last month. I just put up a new blog post comparing the 6 heavy bombers of the core factions, along with the odd thing the CoA has ;). Let me know what you think!

http://www.manbattlestations.com/blog/2015/05/22/bombs-away-dw-heavy-bombers/

Landlubber

  • Administrator
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Number of Times Thanked: 64
    • View Profile
Re: Heavy Bomber Comparison
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2015, 11:37:08 pm »
Thanks for the write-up Ruck. I have a couple thoughts about the FSA's B-72, as it is the only one of the heavy bombers with which I have experience.

Your point about the Heavy Bombers having to distinguish themselves in an already-crowded field of medium flyers (at least for the core seven nations) is well-taken. My theory, though, is that Spartan is giving the core seven nations a wide variety of models for a wide variety of situations. (I see the alliance and merc factions more as "specialists", but that's my own theory.) The B-72 is a good example. For medium-class flyers, the FSA can field the PYB-2, the Lee scoutship, the John Henry robot, and the A-17 torpedo bomber. However, the B-72 is the only one of the FSA's medium flyers that has Piercing Munitions. This gives me a weapon that can help me deal with Ablative Armor or shields--I still have a chance of causing critical hits without having to get past CR ratings. So the B-72 might be more useful when I'm facing the Russians or the CoA.

Also, regarding the Low-Level Flyer ability:  this gives the B-72 more survivability on the approach to the target. It's a medium capital model, and once it goes low-level, it is considered to occupy the surface height level and becomes essentially a surface skimmer. While it also gains the "Vulnerability" MAR and can't use bombs, it also means the B-72 can mask its approach with both surface ships and terrain.



"Sometimes, you gotta roll the hard six."--Commander Adama

Ruckdog

  • Administrator
  • Admiral
  • *****
  • Posts: 3066
  • Number of Times Thanked: 189
  • Dive! Dive!
    • View Profile
    • Man Battlestations!
Re: Heavy Bomber Comparison
« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2015, 05:57:07 pm »
Thanks for the run-down on the Low Level flyer rule; makes much more sense now!